in

Air pollution: the European Union tightens its standards but without aligning with the WHO


This Tuesday, February 21, the EU strengthened its standards on air quality by 2030, but without aligning them with the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) as demanded by MEPs, against a backdrop of tensions over the impact of environmental regulations.

While 300,000 premature deaths are attributable to air pollution each year in the European Union, the Twenty-Seven have formally set a “zero pollution” objective for 2050.

First step to achieve this: MEPs and negotiators from member states agreed on Tuesday evening on stricter limits for 2030 for several pollutants: fine particles, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, etc. “A major step to guarantee a healthier future” by revising “obsolete standards, some of which were fifteen to twenty years old”greeted Social Democratic MEP Javi Lopez, rapporteur of the text.

Each country will have to develop a detailed roadmap, according to the agreement, which must still be formally confirmed by states and MEPs.

Less ambitious objectives than those of the WHO

For nitrogen dioxide and fine particles less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) (very harmful because they penetrate deep into the lungs), the permitted annual limit values ​​will be lowered by more than half in 2030 compared to today ‘today.

“The standards will be revised again by December 2030, then at least every five years, and more often if justified by scientific advances, such as revised WHO guidelines”specifies a press release from Parliament.

But for now, the new objectives set for 2030 remain well below the recommendations of the international organization, updated in 2021.

In their initial mandate in mid-September, MEPs called for strict and binding alignment by 2035 with WHO guidelines. The Member States simply supported the values ​​for 2030 proposed by the European Commission, which were much less drastic.

Air pollution acts as a “accelerator of inequalities”

As part of the Green Deal, the legislation was the subject of fierce negotiations, with a number of states (like right-wing EPP MEPs) pleading for less restrictive standards and broad exemptions.

Ultimately, States may request that the 2030 deadline be postponed until 2040 in the event of specific conditions: for example when pollutant reductions require the replacement of a part ” considerable “ domestic heating systems, or in the event of unfavorable mountainous terrain.

“The progress made in the law leaves a bitter taste. In many regions, citizens may have to wait more than a decade to breathe cleaner air.”sighs Ugo Taddei, of the NGO ClientEarth, calling on States to take “concrete measures to protect the most vulnerable”.

“Clean air is a necessity: it represents better health, more social justice, a more efficient economy. Air pollution acts as an accelerator of social inequalities”European Commissioner for the Environment Virginijus Sinkevicius commented on Tuesday.

An “attack on the Green Deal” according to an environmentalist MEP

However, Norbert Lins, EPP rapporteur, considers the concessions insufficient: “We were advocating for realistic limits that improve the air without endangering our economy or disproportionately restricting our citizens. This balance is not achieved », criticized the elected German conservative. He deplores a rushed schedule, the “lack of flexibility” and the supposed impact on agriculture or transport.

“The reactionary attack on the Green Deal undermines efforts to control pollution. The health of populations and the environment cannot continue to suffer from lax laws and poor enforcement”replies Romanian Green MEP Nicolae Stefanuta.

If he regrets the non-alignment with the WHO, he welcomes ” one step forward “ and the progress of the text in terms of access to justice and compensation.

The legislation allows for recourse to the courts, including by NGOs, in the event of exceeding the set standards, and citizens whose health is affected by air pollution will be able to claim considerable compensation in court.

Finally, the text provides for the increase in air quality measurement points, and the harmonization of indices in the EU so that they are “comparable, clear and publicly accessible”.

However, many Member States are already struggling to meet current air quality standards. This month, Brussels again sent a formal notice to Paris. France had already been singled out in 2019 by European justice for overtaking “systematic” nitrogen dioxide limits in several cities.



Source link

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Supreme Court weighs challenge to EPA ‘good neighbor’ air pollution rule

Critics of EPA ‘Good Neighbor’ Rule Get Clean Air Act Wrong