Chicago’s Mining Ordinance: Environmental & Community Concerns

In the 10th Ward of Chicago, a storm is brewing over a proposed mining ordinance. The proposal, championed by Alderman Peter Chico, seeks to amend zoning laws to potentially allow mining activities for a project known as the Invert. The project, a two-story underground commercial real estate complex, is projected to generate over 3,000 jobs and include a park and community center. But the proposal has struck a nerve among local community activists and environmentalists.

Community Backlash

For many Chicagoans, the Invert project feels like a breach of trust. They argue that they were blindsided and disrespected by the lack of consultation regarding the project. This sentiment is particularly strong in the Southeast Side, a neighborhood burdened by a history of industrial pollution. Recently, residents protested against a scrap metal shredder project due to concerns about air quality and potential health risks. The proposal for mining activities at the Invert, they argue, is yet another potential environmental hazard being thrust upon them.

Environmental Concerns

Environmentalists echo the community’s concerns. They worry that allowing mining as part of the Invert project would lead to a significant environmental setback. In particular, they point to the involvement of Ozinga Ventures, a company linked to the construction materials industry, in the project. Given the industry’s history with environmental degradation, they argue that the Invert project could prove disastrous for Chicago’s environment. Furthermore, they fear that the proposed zoning amendment could open the door for further mining activities in the city.

A Call for a Cumulative Impact Ordinance

In response to the proposed mining ordinance, community activists are advocating for the introduction of a Cumulative Impact Ordinance. Such an ordinance would require the city to consider the cumulative environmental impacts of proposed developments, effectively protecting neighborhoods from bearing an unfair share of environmental burdens. They argue that allowing mining, particularly in the Southeast Side, would contradict the city’s efforts to ensure safe and healthy communities.

The controversy surrounding the Invert project and the proposed mining ordinance is a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle between economic development and environmental protection. As the city of Chicago grapples with this issue, the world will be watching closely.